Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
很好听，很好哭。但不适合拍电影啊……太单调了……像是网飞大电影
整部电影就是很平的，我不想说真实事件如何如何，电影就一般般。
最后的反转有点意思，其余就是韩式自洽电影的套路…
无论经历前人多少刻骨铭心的痛失亲人 忍辱负重的调查真相 即使将事实摆在眼前最终也变成政客资本家互相推诿的皮球而已 万字诉讼和实验报告换不来一句三个字的道歉
整体的故事的过程显得老套，但这也是真实事件，后面的反转我觉得还可以。
这是一个挺令人难过的电影，这种难过之处在于那种知道缺陷在哪却无法对抗无力感。本以为这作为一部电影也想给生活中的人留点幻想，留下一个稍显圆满的结局，但到影片最后看着受难者门的诉说，议员满脸不屑还有各个部门之间的相互推诿，我就知道我错了，或许早就该知道了，早到知道这个通过国家安全认证的时候就应该知道了，这里哪里有人会在乎普通百姓。。。悲哀！可以一想到，这是根据现实事件改编的，更加悲哀！
都很可怜但是都不无辜be like，看后半截的时候简直怀疑中秋看前五十分钟哭成狗的自己是不是看了两部片。从无数网友感动留言和视频开始一路崩，尬到饭都吃不下去后面半快进着看完了。什么鬼。
抖音解说 看剧情一般 唯一的亮点是反转 可怕的真实事件改编
看的时候会想到《黑水》，但这部片就拍得挺平淡的，顺着时间线讲了个故事，让人骂两句无良厂商、官商勾结之类的。演员其实表现也平平，金相庆的表演好像一直是这种无起伏状态，李先彬实在是不行，好几场戏都想吐槽…
加湿器杀菌剂引发的血案，电影本身很真实，但事件真相足够震惊全社会，确实佩服南边对其政府腐败的彻底揭露，电影确实不是给韩国人看的，是给边上邻居们看的。
多一星给真实背景把。整体故事叙述还算ok，但就很普通，没什么出彩的地方。韩国拍这样的电影还真是满熟练的。
依旧是骇人听闻的事件！但拍的毫无张力，结尾更是硬反转，真实事件也这样吗？不如转成纪录片更好一点。
很普通的社会事件改编。最后的主管反转是亮点。
这一切拍摄都是套路化，模式化，几乎就是让人找不到任何感动的点
这不是民事诉讼，这根本就是杀人罪。这电影拍得挺好的，至少目前中国绝不可能出现，打低分的是什么心理。
真实的生活中，这种案件很少被公平公正的对待吧，所以赢得引起了关注拍出了电影，这个世界上真的有正义吗，正义不一直都在迟到吗，当不需要的时候正义到来了，那当时需要正义的那些人，就永远的结束了。
想说的想拍的，都能真么直白的放上银幕，这是何等的幸事
电影最后那里审问有点拉，本身拍的一般，但只有亲身经历过黑暗才会感同身受，多给一颗星
算不上灾难片，只能说是现实题材。每一幕都拍的特别潦草，台词写得一贯犀利。在韩国，中产确实是中流砥柱，反派也得有良心。
电影有一波三折的情节，但仔细一想，大多就来自于真实事件本身，通过蒙太奇对故事本身加分的东西并不多
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
