Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.
To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.
At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.
Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
我也看完了，看到评论区说这剧情无非多了几段其他不是一摸一样吗?但如果认真看就可以发现发展路线完全变了，桐人和亚丝娜在电影结尾同行了，也就是说桐人独行发生的事（黑猫骑士团）以及收后宫的事情发展会有一个大的转变，以及亚丝娜如何加入血盟骑士团，如何变成闪光亚丝娜，还有新角色的加入，毫不夸张的说这是一个全新的SAO故事当然我没看过小说，动画党，除非作者真的只是为了圈钱狗血的将新角色“硬”塞进旧剧情，否则下一部就会与原动画剧情有一个极大的不同，我倒希望这是一个创新的故事，电影里桐人和亚丝娜的故事线并没有分开，那么茅场晶彦又会以怎样的形式登场呢?只能说拭目以待吧。
米特逃跑那一段真的是不可理喻，感觉被喂了一大口屎。说实在的，米特如果为了救亚丝娜而战死，电影的观感就不会出现一点问题。
十几年过去了，香港警匪片里还是那些老面孔和老套路，但是真的爽啊！包括枪战、肉搏、追车、两人在警局里的对峙，还有谢霆锋这个疯批美人。
双雄、追车、枪战，展现出港产动作片的传统荣光，最后特意设置在教堂的肉搏戏，双方都拿出了相互撕咬的狠劲。陈木胜的突然离开，也让谢霆锋的倒下，意外染上了时代落幕的意味。
精良的作画，绚烂的特效，让人回味的背景音乐🎶，以及大篇幅华丽的打斗场面，还有细腻的人物感情，我想说很好看。
看的普通话版，对白真的是个大问题，立意不错，有点借鉴小丑，人物还是差了点火候，少了些复杂性，或许是因为审查，也或许是出于商业性，选择了不讲逻辑大起大落过山车式的爽感。
刻画了闪光亚丝娜的内心，浴室那段之前漫画看过，能有剧场版实属不易啊，刀剑这么大个IP希望能越做越好，期待今年的剧场版，如果每年有一部那就太棒了！
我实在是太喜欢谢霆锋那个角色了，他不是为了钱，他就是想复仇。相比较而言，甄子丹就太无趣了。
电影看多了，一进审讯室就能猜到外面会发生啥。剧情简单了，但是谢霆锋真的帅，实在太他妈帅了
动作与枪战拳拳到肉枪枪爆头，敖的疯癫复仇进行到底有爽到，比起邦，敖更贴合怒火。剧情依旧一眼看到头，但谢霆锋这次是真帅。
怒火发于内心 “服务为本 精益求精”；和李安的摩托戏一对比 陈木胜的打击感和紧迫感可震撼太多了
这么多年过去了，那个耍刀的男人还是这么帅。
从出道伊始，谢霆锋就被扣上了“叛逆”的刻板印象，但直到上了年纪有了肌肉，松懈下来不再紧绷的他，才终于把“叛逆”演绎的淋漓尽致。没事少烧菜，多拍拍戏吧，好作品才是真正的“锋味”。
质疑和影射对象仅集中在官僚体制而非整个政治系统，这是《怒火·重案》与《拆弹专家2》最根本的区别，但毕竟定位不同，自然不存在比出个高低的必要性，而怒火和戾气倒是一脉相承；动作场面调度到位，尤其结尾那场教堂决战拍得太好了；子弹射瘸吕良伟揶揄《跛豪》、谢霆锋乔装 “昇味” 厨师揶揄《锋味》戳笑点；谢霆锋不死不能升华质问，即便不是因为审查，也确实必须给他一个bad ending；感情分打满四星。
甄子丹身上荷载的价值实际上并不能代表建制，从各方在四年前庭审中的证词可以得到明确，因此他与所谓反派之间的矛盾在根本上是伪命题，对立关系的稳固依托于他的一贯坚持的信念（其地位实际处于两极之间的平衡点），所以必须承认的缺陷是非常用被任达华约谈的一场戏跟体制达成虚假的共识是极其草率的。甄子丹电影的优势就在于突破了传统动作片刻意将正反派设置为势均力敌的过时思维（现在看来只会显得拉胯），在确保动作的连续、层次性和动作元素的丰富性方面难度都要更大。
尤其是那种一惊一乍的咆哮，邪魅一笑
中规中矩吧，毕竟看了那么多年港片。只是2021了，男人们依旧在枪林弹雨里激战，他们的妻子依然只能诠释担惊受怕的形象，做歹徒手里孱弱的人质。
港片最后的回光返照
三段论：芜湖百合——把桐人画得好崩——喜闻乐见夫妻档！
反派一直智商在线，这点赞
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
