Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
让AI看一堆A24系文艺恐怖片后提取共通元素，从中选取大部分因子然后自动化生成一部新的，就和本片估计差不了多少
中产家庭完美的外表之下，是一个个孤独的灵魂。失去梦醒的母亲，带了帽子的父亲，不被关在的儿子，以及背负了母亲最大期待的女儿，谁也不理解谁，谁也不关心谁。孤独的女儿孵化出了一个鸟人，结果更TMD的孤独，因为除了女儿，鸟人一个亲人都没有。
作为电影确实有些瑕疵，但诚意十足，毕竟儿童电影，剧本不可能多成熟，小演员们真的演的很讨人喜欢，未来再接再厉，多一些孩子们看的真人电影！
当一家之母是个扭曲自私的bitch时，这个家庭就是个悲剧
魔由心生，一代孵化一代。立意不俗，执行差点儿意思。
总之这个碧池太狗了，有这样的母亲真的是倒一辈子的霉。
总之这个碧池太狗了，有这样的母亲真的是倒一辈子的霉。
建议以后改编成电影的话，可以让情节更丰富成熟一点，更成人向
还不错吧，效果剧情都还可以，只是结尾有点儿差事儿，再编排的合理点儿就好了！一念之间的感觉！人的心理都有阴暗面，只是在事情面前哪个占主导，一念天堂一念地狱。。。
孵化 Pahanhautoja (2022).
芬兰冷不丁还给你不一样的冲击。这大概并不是在说惊悚的怪物被孵化，大概率是在影射什么现实？，是我们喂养了怪物，还是我们变成了怪物？摘去面具，谁是谁？？
嗯，创意蛮好，拍出来还是无聊的
恶心的恐怖。孵化的是自己内心的恶；杀掉同学的狗是因为自己不快乐，咬掉同学的手是嫉妒，觉得她会拿到最后一个比赛名额，杀掉小婴儿也是因为嫉妒妈妈对她的爱。 拍的还可以，节奏有点点慢，主要是恶心🤢
童年美好的回忆被改编成这样，其实很想再扣一分。诚然，这是写给孩子的故事，但是一定要这么夸张的丑化成年人的世界，无限美化孩子们么？一个成绩优异的孩子就稍微分心一下就不及格了？就被老师父母唾骂了？就被朋友远离了？父母老师都是面目可憎的，孩子无论犯什么错误都是对的，刻意离间鲁西西皮皮鲁和全世界的关系，这样真的是郑渊洁写童话的本意吗？大力鼓吹逃课撒谎集体作弊，孩子们非要这么去对抗大人的世界吗？这样真的是对的是好的吗？对这个作品的三观感到恶心。
50/100 以母女关系为切入点，对和谐的家庭关系下暗流涌动的危机做解剖和演变，女儿最终在母亲的严苛之下完成了毁灭，取而代之的是邪恶异化变体的重生。但整体来看，高开都没做到，也就中开低走吧，过度的反差感淹没了应有的神秘气质
有其母必有其女，教育子女要成才就是在孵化他们去善变残忍的一面，人之初性本恶。导演的恐怖设定有想法 3.5
推荐人群：
符号，隐喻，文艺惊悚片，病态马基雅维利的母亲孵化了暗黑性格的女儿。
比较无聊，女主最后是被寄生了吗…确实有点像遗传厄运的结尾
还挺好的，老老实实讲故事，虽然没太啥惊喜，但是很真挚的作品
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
