真料还是假腿微博

真料还是假腿微博 高清

评分：
9.0 推荐

分类： 喜剧片 1997

导演： 西里斯科什·慕克吉

立即播放 报错
排序

播放地址

剧情介绍

　　喜剧，讲一个男人通过装假胡子装扮成兄弟两个人，周旋于女友和未来岳父之间，因为岳父喜欢有胡子的人，认为有胡子的人成熟稳重。
　　Ramprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma (Amol Palekar) is looking for a better paying job. He and his sister Ratna (Manju Singh) have no relatives or acquaintances except Dr. Kedar (David). Dr.Kedar tells him about Bhavani Shankar's (Utpal Dutt) firm known as Urmila Traders. Shankar is a weird man. He is a man of traditional values, hence he naturally hates youth wearing modern clothes. He is a sports fan, but thinks lowly of youth knowing anything about sports. But his most weird trait is hatred towards men without moustaches. He thinks that men without moustaches are characterless.
　　Ramprasad has a moustache. He takes care of other problems by wearing kurta & feigning ignorance about sports. Bhavani hires him immediately. Ram is a hardworking guy, so Bhavani (& Ram) have no problems. However, Ram once takes leave by pretending that his mother (who died many years ago) has taken ill, and goes to watch a hockey match. Bhavani Shankar, who also attended the match, sees him there.
　　The next day Bhavani summons Ramprasad to his office and asks him about the Hockey match. Remembering the plot of a movie a friend of his is shooting, Ram convinces Bhavani Shankar that he had seen his "moustache-less" identical twin Lucky (alias Lakshmanprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma) at the stadium.
　　Bhavani Shankar buys his argument & feels bad about accusing him and decides to make amends by hiring Lucky to teach his daughter Urmila (Bindiya Goswami) music. Ramprasad reluctantly shaves his moustache to become Lucky and starts to teach music to Urmila. He is helped by his actor friend Deven Verma (playing himself).
　　Now Urmila aka Urmi is the exact opposite of her father. She takes immediate liking to Lucky, while Ram is barely noticed by her. Bhavani notices this & gives Ram another job to tutor on the pretext of her exams. Meanwhile, Mrs. Srivastav (Dina Pathak), a socialite, is roped to play the part of Ram, "Lakshman" & Ratna's mother. Like Ram, she also ends up playing her own twin in front of Bhavani.
　　Ram decides to tell Urmila the truth. Urmila tells him to tell the truth to Bhavani as well. Ram goes to Bhavani to tell the truth, but Bhavani sees Ram's moustache giving away. Bhavani exposes Ram, but ends up thinking that Lucky murdered Ram & impersonated him to marry Urmila.
　　In a hilarious chase that follows, Bhavani ends up totalling a police jeep. The Senior Inspector (Om Prakash) mistakes him for a thug named Pascal D'Costa & is about to lock him up in the jail. Only when his Inspector identifies Bhavani Shankar by his real identity is he freed. By now, a harried Bhavani has developed hatred for twin as well.
　　On coming home, he finds that Urmila & Lucky are married. He refuses to give them blessings, until Dr.Kedar comes to the scene & explains the whole situation. Now, Bhavani becomes even more furious, but on everybody's insistence, relents. The film ends with a family photo of Mrs.Srivastav, Ratna, Urmila, Ram, Dr.Kedar, Bhavani's sister Kalindi (Shubha Khote) & Bhavani (who is shown without moustache).

猜你喜欢

评论:

  • 涵雅 4小时前 :

    如此高概念的设定为电影提供了许多解读方向，但完成度并不高（很多地方都是一笔带过便没了后文）确实有故弄玄虚的嫌疑。对于new sex可能方式的探讨挺有意思，但又觉得讲得浅了些。

  • 蔡思柔 5小时前 :

    未来狂想配上后工业风格的美术，柯南伯格的老本已经被吃完了。蕾雅赛杜是看下去的动力。

  • 盛高达 7小时前 :

    性、暴力、欲望，电影以及艺术无非就那么点事

  • 板新月 3小时前 :

    故弄玄虚，光怪陆离

  • 鹿骊美 4小时前 :

    文艺青年型片子，想看恐怖惊悚的结果看了一堆对话…

  • 楠静 7小时前 :

    完全解构的世界观，完全不同的体系，完全不同的标准，这样的剧情，需要我们大脑去解码。当痛变成了享受，当器官成了艺术品，当切割身体成了性爱，一切有了不同的意义。维果莫腾森的演技牛逼。

  • 浑浩言 5小时前 :

    艺术或许是没有意义的、宗教是没有意义的

  • 福燕婉 9小时前 :

    展与环境影响的辩证法，表明人并不是独立生

  • 计冰彦 6小时前 :

    堆砌概念和绝对柯南伯格的元素，通篇给人一种故弄玄虚的不适感，一种又高潮又没有高潮的感觉。

  • 翁雅诗 7小时前 :

    概念很新奇，设定也很有趣，但故事本身乏善可陈，惺惺作态，实在大失所望…

  • 袁亦旋 5小时前 :

    全员BDSM满级，艺个术毛毛，一肱肌不行就开始臆想肚子里cooking，元素特别简陋，废墟体，拼夕夕品质塑料模型道具，最后硬塞一个困扰人类百年的污染解决的简单粗暴方案的主线出来，艺术人的脑子里都装的是啥？

  • 洛涵映 5小时前 :

    说是科幻，道具布景却很简陋。不仅成本低，剧情也有点莫名其妙。

  • 机光熙 5小时前 :

    影像风格还蛮不错，但概念与精神内核远大于故事本身，或许更适合放在现代艺术展(?)。一头雾水观影完毕和朋友翻阅无数评价分析之后得出：柯南伯格，我确实不懂你。蕾雅赛杜本片最佳。

  • 鹤家 6小时前 :

    性即手术，解剖即快感，新型进化的展现，却是一场器官血肉交融的狂欢，不仅是身体进行的一场革命，更是人类思维的一场政治战争，渴望顺应变化和旧古思想遵从器官逻辑的人，本质上都在对社会未来作出自己的抉择，柯南伯格依旧有像四十年前般的前卫，最后其实也是一场向社会媒体公众的新导向，有《录像带谋杀案》的味道。但可惜在于，场景和对话全在解释这个世界，显得过于空洞，那些极致的肉体美学让人惊喜，也挽回不了刻意的展现和沉闷的叙事，喜欢却也不太能给出高分，想起当初看柯南伯格老片的惊艳感，或许是能代入到那个年代所突出的独特思维，而本片的设定在这个时代，只能说还可以更加大胆

  • 鹤柏 1小时前 :

    感觉（至少）从《危险方法》开始，他的每一部电影都像是给自己创作方法写的说明书：有论题、论据，有清醒可辨的段落、Key Word、总结……就像解剖一具尸体一样。也即是像大脑一样感知和思考的电影，而不是用官觉去感知的。在以往（00年代以前？），身体恐怖还只是作为字面意义上的伤痕和畸变的形式出现，但之后便越来越少，到这部干脆就剔除了疼痛，而陌异感恰恰来自疼痛的消失。当大脑丧失了对躯体的知觉时，当一具躯体无论如何对它的大脑而言都无异于一具尸体时，它其中的器官如何相互沟通并像大脑一样开始感知和思考自身——这是《大都会》和《未来罪行》致力于展现的，柯南伯格在无政府和尸体的世界中打造智慧的身体（“生命”）。

  • 枫林 8小时前 :

    极度缺乏睡眠时逼自己去大银幕第一次看这位，结果睡了40分钟打破了个人记录（电脑上重看统计了时间）。如此直白地强调metaphor和emotion却和Titane位于两个极端，采访里自述更像note而非影像与台词里的“Better with conceptual art”的自嘲足以表明态度，不如将对形式的反对上升到纯文字的“高度”。尽管配乐、希腊外景与室内戏打光、中景特写的切换和所有手术场景的运动是为数不多的亮点且对话和全景甚至拍得像花絮，在电脑上补完后依然觉得值得为概念加半星，有种转瞬即逝的内在诗意。认可度终于成功从dream is the new sex转向surgery！

  • 林晨涛 0小时前 :

    福柯，颅内高潮，New-fashion sex。

  • 智晴岚 1小时前 :

    如果人真的进化到用病态的器官改造作为艺术，那么离灭亡也就不远了。

  • 昝素怀 3小时前 :

    服了。完全是对艺术行业的满满讽刺，对当代艺术家的慢慢讽刺

  • 籍叶飞 4小时前 :

    flesh的空性以及追逐或违背它的痛苦，还是围绕着consumed展开的，电影界对欲望之物质主义最具身的描绘一直都在柯南伯格这里，此片复古感在当下就像回到九十年代，这其实反而是科幻政治电影里的old sex了吧！

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved