李红涛无刷电机真假

李红涛无刷电机真假 高清

评分：
9.0 推荐

分类： 喜剧片 1993

导演： 西里斯科什·慕克吉

立即播放 报错
排序

播放地址

剧情介绍

　　喜剧，讲一个男人通过装假胡子装扮成兄弟两个人，周旋于女友和未来岳父之间，因为岳父喜欢有胡子的人，认为有胡子的人成熟稳重。
　　Ramprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma (Amol Palekar) is looking for a better paying job. He and his sister Ratna (Manju Singh) have no relatives or acquaintances except Dr. Kedar (David). Dr.Kedar tells him about Bhavani Shankar's (Utpal Dutt) firm known as Urmila Traders. Shankar is a weird man. He is a man of traditional values, hence he naturally hates youth wearing modern clothes. He is a sports fan, but thinks lowly of youth knowing anything about sports. But his most weird trait is hatred towards men without moustaches. He thinks that men without moustaches are characterless.
　　Ramprasad has a moustache. He takes care of other problems by wearing kurta & feigning ignorance about sports. Bhavani hires him immediately. Ram is a hardworking guy, so Bhavani (& Ram) have no problems. However, Ram once takes leave by pretending that his mother (who died many years ago) has taken ill, and goes to watch a hockey match. Bhavani Shankar, who also attended the match, sees him there.
　　The next day Bhavani summons Ramprasad to his office and asks him about the Hockey match. Remembering the plot of a movie a friend of his is shooting, Ram convinces Bhavani Shankar that he had seen his "moustache-less" identical twin Lucky (alias Lakshmanprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma) at the stadium.
　　Bhavani Shankar buys his argument & feels bad about accusing him and decides to make amends by hiring Lucky to teach his daughter Urmila (Bindiya Goswami) music. Ramprasad reluctantly shaves his moustache to become Lucky and starts to teach music to Urmila. He is helped by his actor friend Deven Verma (playing himself).
　　Now Urmila aka Urmi is the exact opposite of her father. She takes immediate liking to Lucky, while Ram is barely noticed by her. Bhavani notices this & gives Ram another job to tutor on the pretext of her exams. Meanwhile, Mrs. Srivastav (Dina Pathak), a socialite, is roped to play the part of Ram, "Lakshman" & Ratna's mother. Like Ram, she also ends up playing her own twin in front of Bhavani.
　　Ram decides to tell Urmila the truth. Urmila tells him to tell the truth to Bhavani as well. Ram goes to Bhavani to tell the truth, but Bhavani sees Ram's moustache giving away. Bhavani exposes Ram, but ends up thinking that Lucky murdered Ram & impersonated him to marry Urmila.
　　In a hilarious chase that follows, Bhavani ends up totalling a police jeep. The Senior Inspector (Om Prakash) mistakes him for a thug named Pascal D'Costa & is about to lock him up in the jail. Only when his Inspector identifies Bhavani Shankar by his real identity is he freed. By now, a harried Bhavani has developed hatred for twin as well.
　　On coming home, he finds that Urmila & Lucky are married. He refuses to give them blessings, until Dr.Kedar comes to the scene & explains the whole situation. Now, Bhavani becomes even more furious, but on everybody's insistence, relents. The film ends with a family photo of Mrs.Srivastav, Ratna, Urmila, Ram, Dr.Kedar, Bhavani's sister Kalindi (Shubha Khote) & Bhavani (who is shown without moustache).

猜你喜欢

评论:

  • 柔欣 1小时前 :

    奥斯卡最佳影片提名，温馨的家庭故事，真实的像是纪录片，每个人都有一个难忘的童年，一个怀念的家乡

  • 狄惜筠 7小时前 :

    这片子，其实画面拍的还蛮有厚度的。故事与主旨的话，看大家说是致敬自己的童年，自己的家乡。那其实已经避免了很多残酷血腥的暴力，更着重于美好的故事以及家人之间的相守与推动。还可以吧…比《西区故事》好看！哈哈哈

  • 那拉春蕾 7小时前 :

    电影拍得不错。但就是一段个人的童年回忆，即使配乐美丽如斯，也无法共情。

  • 馨心 2小时前 :

    （爱你的家人会在离别时讲"go now, don’t look back.” 啊 我也好想奶奶:( for those who stayed, for those who left, and for those who are lost; 讨论搬家时其中一册booklet是start a new journey in Vancouver, 这些事都已两年了

  • 水嘉良 1小时前 :

    几乎看不到导演的野心，精心布置的街道和不痛不痒的台词同当时新教和天主教之间腥风血雨紧张形成了严重的割裂。全然不能以一句“孩童之视角”掩盖导演过于追求唯美形式的干枯品味。《自己去看》、《穿条纹睡衣的男孩》也都是以孩童视角，在这中间往往传递一种环境异化与教育引导的渗透，当所有人都被整个不安的社会环境所裹挟，那孩童视角便更加残忍锋利。这部影片并没有看到，俨然是平淡而又生活化的流水账。父亲的矛盾是纳税和赌马，母亲的任务是在暴乱中教育小孩，整个家庭是游离于斗争之外，外界的环境矛盾中心并不是靠几场骇人听闻的教父演说的戏码就能阐明清楚的。

  • 琬锦 6小时前 :

    两种风格放在影片里 我觉得不搭且不适

  • 胤胤 6小时前 :

    我就觉得男主眼熟，后来发现是黑灰飞～用小孩子的眼睛看动荡的社会，没查点儿英国历史背景容易跟不上，能给到七分

  • 满承悦 3小时前 :

    看到友邻们的评分放低了期待值，所以还是超出预期的，音乐很加分，喜欢爷爷奶奶的爱情“你的心跳过吗”“每次你走进房间，它就会跳一支吉格舞”

  • 阚千风 6小时前 :

    看得舒心又揪心，从这个普通人家的故事里，看到自己的小时候，想起今早和母亲通的电话。有的人离开，有的人坚守，生活就像片中神父形容的那样，变成叉子的两个尖尖，从此分叉，但神父又没有全说对，没有哪条路是天堂或地狱，只是不同的人生，因为曾经共同的来处，而互相眺望和想念。

  • 雅敏 8小时前 :

    无论她是什么宗教，只要她正直与善良，你就可以和她在一起。

  • 谷雅娴 4小时前 :

    个人较为无感的状态之一源于我本就没有归属的漂泊，但严格来说剧情的设置也撑不起离开和留下这所有选择的症结，另外演技真的就一般，观看后的记忆点竟都是配角

  • 翠凡灵 3小时前 :

    有很多不足 但导演对于故乡、童年、亲情的回溯都那么纯真和美好，满满的爱。

  • 盍依凝 7小时前 :

    太过于自我了，不是每条道路都通《罗马》，情感要有，技术也要有

  • 翁问萍 3小时前 :

    基本是《罗马》的套路，孩童视角的大时代历史变革➕60s黑白怀旧风，OST的民谣蛮动人。摄影构图非常好，但服化道的细节并不太像六十年代，不知道是不是预算不够

  • 莱依秋 6小时前 :

    未免太悬浮了 感觉没有回忆的真实和温度反而像是漂浮在舞台上的一出舞台剧 cinematography搞得像是photography 不缺乏美感但是缺乏影像的流动感 就非常平庸吧 即使题材应该能让我感同身受也始终没有产生情感联结

  • 邦韦 5小时前 :

    Kenneth Branagh的童年，写给故乡Belfast的一封情书。影像和叙事会让我想到《罗马》，都是怀念的故事啊！

  • 钟凯泽 4小时前 :

    布拉纳赶快下场吧……回去养老吧！

  • 闵阳荣 2小时前 :

    最值得记忆的点，基本上就是最后那一刻的奶奶，在琉璃门后面的脸。同为小孩作为主角的电影，童一个世界对于视角的态度比此片先锋许多。中规中矩，音乐不免对情感有反作用了。

  • 鹏运 5小时前 :

    小孩子也许是不知道什么是痛苦的，只有留下来的judi dench眼里充满了复杂的情绪（只想在这时候唱一首归乡（如果说好看得不像是肯爹导的应该会被打死（dtt女儿好美啊呜呜呜

  • 良祥 0小时前 :

    电影院听原声真是太伤害观影体验了😭 我不信我英语那么差一定是他们口音的锅。 去看之前只知道是讲一个街区的故事，也做好了被感动的准备，没有太多的背景知识了解加挺不懂让我对街区冲突的起承转合都完全不明白。但是这样也似乎贴合了导演想表现的儿童视角，童年为什么会有冲突不记得不知道，只知道妈妈会想骑士一样举起盾牌保护我，爸爸和哥哥在坏人来的时候会保护我和妈妈，暗恋的女孩互相交换礼物道别（虽然很学霸的送了我数学教辅）。 在这样的家庭里相信不论去哪里生活都会过得好。最后三行话看到直接泪目，坐在新西兰小文艺电影院看电影的我，那一刻究竟是stay的（对比大批回国的留学生），还是left的，还是lost的呢？ 大概这部片子最适合的就是移居他处远离故土的人了。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved