Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
“人生只是一个漫长的寄宿生活”
不过不失的家庭和解片，群山的镜头很治愈，有钱任性反叛的奶奶时不时流露对身边人爱的妥协
2010 日本 意外的幸运签；2018 泰国 借来的100天
这个狗死孙子为何不愿好好照顾自己奶奶，就是家里太优裕了，惯一身臭毛病
我说怎么辣么眼熟呢？原来是翻拍他泰的，不过男主是真的帅，像四字弟弟。
就……难看，总要死一个人，但开头就对人物没好感也没有让人沉浸两人爱情的要素，试图树立配角形象但都浮于表面，无节奏粉丝向作品，尤其结尾错过真是叫人心梗。
我也多么想有一个这么酷的亲人啊 喝酒聊天
兰普琳好有气质的女人，很喜欢这种化解隔代矛盾，解开心结的题材影片。本片配乐很到位。
想起了dear Evan Hanson 但是太拖延太鸡汤了 是谁杀了我 原来是我杀了我！
谁不是在这苦海中浮浮沉沉，每日的强颜欢笑不过是为了憧憬中阳光健硕的躯体。有什么好怕，大不了找个角落舔好伤口再伺机而行，这就是我们亲爱的草蛋生活。
虽然很俗套但是我还是哭完了一大包纸巾🧻晴人没认出美咲在意料之中，但那里还是好虐😭😭😭
阿真，找回了自己，找回了曾经也获得过幸福的自己，自己遗忘了身边的幸福。
之前看过泰版的解说，所以看的时候带着点儿上帝视角了。
总感觉这个价值观毁三观。如果禽兽教师被绳之以法或者得到惩罚，这个电影主题就会稍微更正能量一点。而女主应该觉醒，尽管自己想要通过考试成功也要凭自己的努力不能出卖自己身体，这样出卖等价交换的原则会教坏女孩子，就这一点感觉导演三观有点不正
Ps、谁说的松本穗香是女版贺来贤人啊啊啊，越看越像啊啊啊我受不了了。
🎬《酒鬼奶奶》🌟🌟🌟
有点可惜，设定有些强行设定，将樱花与生命连同起来，可是一切发生的太突然，如果剧情传统也没有关系，主要是情感共鸣的铺垫实属有点让人感觉可惜，但
优雅而刻薄的老太太，至死的浪漫，我喜欢这种平铺直叙，让我能觉得人生其实也是平平无奇的，
那潇洒的一饮而尽
整个片子很平，但还是想起了那段以为被全世界抛弃了的青春期，爱的人就在身边从未改变。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
