A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
这类剧情被朴树的一首《那些花儿》就唱完了。
前陣子剛在am把這個樂隊的《世界觀》加進資料庫，今天看完電影順著網易雲找這個樂隊的時候，排在top1的歌曲是那個人推薦給我的漫畫改編的電影，至今他分享給我的電子版漫畫還躺在百度雲未曾被下載過。
跟花束对比还是差了一些
只是在某个瞬间想起了一点 「语言相通就一定能心灵相通吗」「不说出来一定不行」 注定离开的结局 但是美好过 7月28日 蛋糕可以吃 人会忘记 东京奥运会结束了 新冠疫情快点过去
当然，必须插一句，心目中目前观感最好的倒叙故事，还得是岸西的『亲密』。
倒序看起来似乎没那么悲伤。水族馆跳舞真的好有爱！
论观感上因为男女主角不够漂亮…比花束更日常也更细腻。我会觉得是7分。but 免费看家旁边的场次，挺开心。
以“生日”为叙事线，由点到面，从爱情消亡的结局回看爱情的开始，好悲伤。导演似乎一直想阐述“人与人间语言的隔阂”这个问题，脱离想象界进入符号的象征界后，用语言能传达到的情感已经苍白匮乏。假使我可以装作不经意地将心里的话不合时宜地说出口，可我们中间的空白永远无法消弭，最终或许还是会无力到想不起彼时的那些感受，普通人的爱情can‘t remembering。
“爱情是不存在的，存在的只是爱情的证据。”
如果说恋爱大多爱而不得的结果无法改变
2022年最佳。全篇是用倒叙视角，因为后面恋爱的痕迹，所以会让人期待，痕迹怎样发生。我们是如此简单地进入他人的生活，然后忍不住想要和她一起跳舞，看海洋生物，在巷子里漫游，在天台放烟花，在沙发上突然的表白，拉住你不想让你回家。爱是忍不住靠近，爱不是该被理智打败的东西。
年轻真好 别人说什么都信真好 元气满满真好 轻松生活真好 放松的遇见喜欢的人真好 跳舞真好 音乐真好 夕阳真好
电影结束后的舞台挨拶，超乎想象的松散没节奏w两人谈了各自喜欢的《地球之夜》里的片段，聊了沙莉（她真可爱！）出演的CreepHyp的那支mv里最后的搞笑片段ww以及原来片名是池松氏想出来的，导演一开始拟定的名字又土有中二（我记不起来了）。
回放爱情，初识萌芽试探暧昧表白热恋矛盾吵架枯萎结束，的倒放。题眼是男主角每一年的生日，听起来没什么新意其实展现出来感觉很好，蛋糕、猫咪、发夹、路边神像等小细节到位。整体感觉比花束要更写实一些，最喜欢海洋馆的片段，横滨天堂海洋馆？的蓝色浪漫。看伊藤莎莉一直都是日剧配角，这个角色很适合，初识及热恋期的活泼可爱（啊虽然嗓音独特但她真的好可爱皮肤也巨好！初识攀岩跳舞追逐真就超可爱）和后期的留恋佯装冷静等状态，池松驾轻就熟，吻戏不错，两个都很会！（小酒馆老板的可爱对象很可爱，成田凌乱入自己吐槽自己可还行哈哈哈）我还可以看这样细节满满的日本爱情电影！！！还有等待妻子的男人，打灯失误道歉的那个歌手作为头尾的连接…如何摔伤脚不重要，后来出名的暗恋女二送的礼物是什么也不重要，重要的是每年这一天都还记得你
啊⋯⋯這個結構我超喜歡⋯⋯ 也有「被傷到」一點點⋯⋯ 告白的那段有看哭 很多日片的片尾曲風格我都很不理解 包括這部
片名好：稍微想起一些。想起一些不重要的，但还是会稍微想起的，人。
喜欢水族馆的戏份、喜欢依偎在一起吃蛋糕的戏份、喜欢天台放烟花的戏份，谁都喜欢看甜甜的恋爱，现实却有着太多的分道扬镳。希望更多的不是只是稍微想起。池松壮亮真的好会演，好喜欢看他演戏，舒服自然。
以倒叙的形式讲述一场爱情，演员演技也很给力
小叶嘴硬开车离开，从后视镜里看着被留下的照生和蛋糕，说“也不追一下”的时候，莫名被触动了
3/7/2022 9:50pm bc / 敗筆是找她當女角。。她像肥師奶啊
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
