Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
如果永远都无法忘记，那就用“永远”去忘记。我们可以评判这部电影的表现手法，却无法评判拥有这份记忆的人。那是独属于他的颜色，无论这个钴蓝湖面刮着多猛烈的意大利夏风
那段美好的恋爱让我一辈子怀念，让我一辈子刻骨铭心，景好美，人也很美
过程中几男都被男主干掉，
气氛营造的还不错，只是演员们显然没有攀岩的技术，整个场景也是假的。
很美 未曾见过的印度 /不要跟情人谈未来。
镜头很美，前半部分很喜欢，可惜后半部分有些割裂，终归是导演要得太多！还有这海报是认真的吗？
这明明是个拿着政治惊悚动作剧本忽悠网飞钱的意大利艺术电影😳，如果不是坂本龙一的配乐认证，差点就错过了这部瓜导弟子的惊喜制作（师徒都爱希胖是吧）…而且JDW还真是适合这种无脑肌肉小白兔的角色啊…对，你不是主角，主角其实是所有的希腊演员（看看导演下刀的位置）。拿着这么个剧本能拍出这种气质，未来可期。
凯莉的女伴苏菲嘴太碎了，上来嘴臭惹男的简直是在给自己找麻烦。剧情中不合理的情节有点多，我就说两个最基本的，1. 想把苏菲的死设计成摔落悬崖，那乔什为啥要用石头砸脸？就为了把同伴拖下水？但你砸脸和摔死这是完全不一样的，验尸官完全可以验出来；2. 乔什想杀查克灭口，直接一脚踹下去就好了，干嘛用锤子砸头？锤子砸的坑跟摔死差了十万八千里，这要验不出，验尸官就是白痴了，这么干简直是脱裤子放屁多此一举，编导都不想想这样设计合理吗？这样经不起推敲的问题真不少，所以影片无法得到高分不是没原因的。我给3星5.7分，删掉！
描写一个砂砾一样的普通人，因为偶然一次交通事故从而卷入一场政治阴谋当中，虽然在一个国家的时代洪流中无足轻重，但是经过抗争还是让自己得到了心灵的拯救。开篇情节太过于缓慢，让人昏昏欲睡，但是从逃亡开始逐步变得紧凑，悬疑感十足，最后的戛然而止显得干净利索，小成本佳作。
PS男主生命力真可怕
【B-】攀岩题材的女性反杀片和密室类型片，虽然入戏比较慢、结尾比较随意、弱化了攀岩过程，但是好在氛围一直在线，剧情一直有合理的事件来推动。
一点装备没有 敢趴那么高 是有人做到
所以永远都不要说一个男人不行，never, ever!
渣男是真够渣的，但是，爱让人更勇敢了，不是吗？
丹泽尔·华盛顿儿子主演，他的表演与电影中所扮演的角色一样，满是厄运，非常糟糕，没有其父的犀利与身手，一张软弱的大众脸，窝窝囊囊，一无是处。导演的叙事亦是懒洋洋，漏洞百出。导演又强行加入了很多政治色彩，却又无力驾驭，更让影片雪上加霜。
剧情有点俗套，攀岩时拍摄镜头和剪辑拼接不是很专业
本来想问外景地在哪，看着那5毛特效沉默了。不过那段岩壁看着没那么难，怎么还想试试。
被人追杀不往外跑，而是往上爬，你是能飞天吗？
情节都是为了攀岩这个形式服务了。当然就是当攀岩来看，也太假。
女主先行离开休息，
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
