A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
对于恐怖片来说，还不错了，不是单纯的扮鬼吓人那种
这一版的OverHeated和弦乐版的Therefore I Am都太好听了.
ps没想到在里面还能看见绝望主妇里的bree，几个主要女演员也都挺好看，detective很帅哈哈
画面非常精美，故事架构有点单一，女主全程惊恐脸没什么演技。中间一度以为在看鬼片和权游衣柜…这部片与其说叫奇异博士不如叫绯红女巫23333 本尼和奥妹的演技还是一绝！
如果我不是女巫粉可能只会打六分 剧情后半段还是有点小感动打戏枪版肯定比不了院线的效果 平心而论没有那么烂也没有那么好
网盘见的第五部漫威电影，obviously不会是最后一部。惊悚元素拉满，导演比较好的融合了个人风格与制片人要求。但整体节奏太快了，很多段落为了赶进度都处理的很草率。作为一部奇异博士的独立电影几乎看不到博士的弧光（除了多了一只眼睛）。wanda好美，独立电影gkd
这张专辑本来就巨好听，这次的现场有不一样的味道，有音频版就好了。
电影质量属于漫威电影系列中的中上乘之作，无论是剧情流畅度，类型片的新探索，还是多元宇宙的正式介入，无一不在说明这是电影工业精细化的产物，但是正是这种精致，凸显了影业集团掌舵人对中国的恶意——意识形态的战争无孔不入
一干人等到处穿梭赶场，有种跟着旅行小团上车聊人生下车打群架的即视感
1. 建议只看后1/3或删减部分。
大型mv电影，歌确实不错，画面质感精美，可以～
青少年表现出的某些释怀其实只是一种自我保护机制
支撑不起管弦乐队的结构...
幼稚，无聊，乃至连恐怖都没做到 🥲 （为啥漫威这么多角色通通都是过去自己的奴隶？塑造人物弧光能不能换个套路，都是成年人了，天天愧疚着死爹死妈死妹妹死孩子的，变成超英了还是在烦恼这些一亿年前的破事儿……）
伏地魔和奇洛大呼内行！最后结局还是有点意思
同為漫威，同為多元宇宙，這部就跟蜘蛛俠那卡通差太遠了
蛮无聊，把旺达拍得像贞子一样，，旺达放不下孩子的执念，奇异博士放不下克里斯汀的执念，这俩法师绝了
舞台布置的很棒，但是disney这波不太行，想像olivia那部一样听到每首歌的创作背景，能感受到billie每首歌的用心，但是并没有第一张那么catchy那么惊艳，第一张基本上循环了一年，第二张都没完整听完，但是确实看完这个有两首歌可以加入歌单
舞台布置的很棒，但是disney这波不太行，想像olivia那部一样听到每首歌的创作背景，能感受到billie每首歌的用心，但是并没有第一张那么catchy那么惊艳，第一张基本上循环了一年，第二张都没完整听完，但是确实看完这个有两首歌可以加入歌单
北美东部来打卡. 整部影片整体来说, 泪点十足. 当Strange精心打着领带参加Christine的婚礼; 当Christine问博士 “Are you happy?”; 当得知Wanda所做的一切只是为了和孩子生活在一起; 当女巫质问Strange “你曾用时间宝石做交易, 这次用孩子换全世界的安宁又有何不可”；当女巫说, “我想取她能力, 这样当孩子生病我可以去任何平行时空寻求医治”: 当博士对Christine说 “I love you in every universe!”…
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
