Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
不错的片子，有很多地方不尽人意但大致看下来还是很舒心的，每一个平凡人都在努力的燃烧自己。
没看够，希望能出第二部，以其他角色为主视角，多拍几部续集
这部电影让我充满了一种特殊的感情，也许是牺牲小我奉献大我，也许是其他的什么，但总之，我很感动
如果没有遇到韩松老师，僧格将来可能呆在草原上放牧，但是在韩松老师的教导下，僧格当上了消防员。这就是教师的意义吧
老师妈妈病危那里看得我绷不住流眼泪了，都是温柔又坚定的善良人，演员们都演的很好
本以为是文艺片，结果不仅仅是文艺，还有那种神奇的剧情？果然是惊喜不断
女主的大哥也写死了女主也太惨了，其实让大哥活着陪伴一起成长奉献也没什么不好吧？
剧情感人，时间跨度大，节奏不拖沓；部分细节因过于文艺而导致失真；这样的支教真的令人钦佩。
每个节点上，都有人教会他成长和坚守的意义，最后，他选择留下，长存，真正解释了生命的意义。
青青的藏区草原，飘飞的风马旗，石砌的玛尼堆，孩子们的热忱，尤其是为保护学校和孩子们牺牲的朗措大哥，深深地感动了这位支教老师。尽自己的绵薄之力，帮助那些学生使他们成长、成才。
绝对好片
我关注点歪了，韩松居然没有高原反应！羡慕死了，藏区的风景真的太美了！
那里的孩子虽然生活条件艰苦，但是对于知识的渴求，深深的感动着我。
电影很温情、文艺，拍摄画面很美，辽阔的草原，人美、心美、风景美。还有孩子们渴望知识的眼神真的很动人。电影感觉缓缓道来很平淡又很激昂共情。
在开头就猜到了大致剧情和结局，但也不妨碍这是一部非常不错的电影。电影场景美丽真实，演员表演纯朴自然，从片子里看到了韩松、朗措的坚守、奉献、勇敢，看到了梅朵的温柔、善良，看到了学生们对知识的渴求，看到了国家教育事业发展越来越好。
真没想到僧格会死，有种自己从小看到大的孩子出事的心痛感，唉真是不知道明天和意外哪个先来
电影很写实很容易代入进去，特别是当地的风土人情，真的特别真实，跟着韩老师一起为孩子们揪心
全场最高潮点可能就是朗措大哥与盗猎者枪击牺牲，托付学生给韩松了。朗措大哥可惜了。
围绕着爱，承诺，坚守，留下的一部电影，情感不错，但是现在多少人能做到
大草原和蓝天很美，那里的人也很纯朴可爱，不错的电影。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
