Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
如果能由第三方执导，站在客观公正的立场，来真实的反映地区冲突的根源，才能被国际社会所接受！那位民兵组织头目，少年时拍过《自己去看》吧。
喜欢关于童年的回忆。夏日，海滩，车上露天电影，游乐场。希望我的孩子长大以后也能有一些童年美好的记忆。
俄罗斯电影风格简单直接，从俄角度看待乌东问题，但中文字幕实在太难认了，所以基本全靠猜
主人公曾在阿富汗，一直想忘记战争，可现在战争就在他身边。亲人被炸死，他能怎样？
动画包装了一缅怀的故事 ，絮叨自念下做了个60年代的无趣梦。梦中踏上的月壤又为如今铺向了何处，不愿提及，或许也不必提及。
动画包装了一缅怀的故事 ，絮叨自念下做了个60年代的无趣梦。梦中踏上的月壤又为如今铺向了何处，不愿提及，或许也不必提及。
小时候做梦自己成为宇航员上天去，还有全家人一起看电视，一群小朋友一起玩……
还是不错的，后边交叉剪辑很不错，整体画风很酷，故事可可爱爱。
从电影的角度来看，这片片拍的很烂。严格的说，这片片是俄罗斯🇷🇺的宣传片——只反应乌东地区乌克兰政府军的暴行，但是没有给出原因……不管怎样，战争都是残酷的，战争都是对生命的犯罪。人类已经来到了今天，来到了全球化、科技异常发展的时代，除非疯子、稍有理智者，稍有对生命有尊重的人，就不可能首先发动战争。
对于当代史的构建，音乐、电影、剧集、综艺等所有的流行文化堆砌成普通中产家庭孩子的童年，“亲身”参与了历史的大事件，并自觉地把自己当作是其中一份子，所谓的想象也在那一刻变成了真实，这是一种非常深刻的认同。我小时候看《泰坦尼克号》，没看完结局就睡着了，海水冲进船舱的画面成了不灭的记忆。主观不喜欢这部作品的原因在于，破碎到像是在做文献综述，呕吐“暂停了”50分钟属实没有必要。
3.5星 动画版的关于导演童年回忆的电影 以登月为背景编了一个故事来描述童年生活的方方面面 有少年视角下美国六十年代全方位的流行文化 也有发生在休斯顿郊区充满欢乐的童年记忆 怀旧又让人羡慕
人得服老，絮絮叨叨琢磨小时候那点事，谁逃的过呢
这种personal memoir性质的作品大概率是毁誉参半的，刚在《灵魂乐之夏》里看到那位说登月的钱不如给Harlem穷人的片段又在这里看到了，1969… what a year
不是一个靠激动人心的冒险故事驱动的电影，Stan幻想中的秘密登月计划只占了非常小的部分，全片都是在讲太空竞赛时期休斯顿郊区儿童丰富多彩的童年生活，喜不喜欢这部电影取决于你喜不喜欢怀旧，我看评论区有人说咱跟美国生活没共鸣，come on，大家都是从小孩子长大的，无论是跟朋友一起玩，还是周末看电视，总有一件两件事是联结我们所有人的吧？旁白娓娓道来理查德·林克莱特的美妙台词，像一部精彩的童年回忆录，我被深深迷住了
人类的记忆很奇特，就算是因为睡去而错过重要时刻，但回想起来依然觉得自己亲眼所见。那些肆意玩乐，追逐电视剧听流行音乐的童年往事真是单纯而快乐。
7/10，满满的对上世纪60-70年代的回忆，登月、上太空是最鲜明的时代特征，而本片正是借着最具有时代符号的事件全方位表达了对时代记忆的怀恋，是兄弟姐妹、玩伴、游戏、歌曲、电影等等。。真美好啊！
在今天俄羅斯與烏克蘭正拼鬥的如火如荼之際，看這部電影真有特殊的意義。
跪求那本书（有朋友说是理查德瓦格纳）的名字！时不时激昂的音乐跟画面一点都不搭啊，时不时的环绕镜头也太主旋律太宣传片了吧！手持部分不错其实很自然，俄罗斯和乌克兰的摄影美学是一致的（臂力惊人，已经可以想象到摄影师颤抖着肌肉快速摇移镜头，就跟举枪摇移射击一样猛晃），本是同根生啊，看过《沃伦》看过《静静的顿河》这种窝里斗和纳粹做法并非空穴来风，一个因为小孩和狗会哭叫就无差别射杀的民族，一个只有坐过牢和打过战才能生存下来的民族（这样存活下来的人只能不停地打战直到死去），一个岁月静好的良民都会被各方残暴杀害的民族，但丁描写的地狱就在此刻的乌克兰，但人家内部分裂并非你侵略的理由，影片里有一句话，当年德国纳粹也说是来解放乌克兰的，结果呢？
太喜欢了，那个充满梦想和希望的年代，导演所展现出来的休斯顿生活令人向往
胜在题材的罕见，乌克兰亲俄方视角的乌克兰东部战争。很血腥的战斗场面。经费大概不够充裕，爆炸拍摄的地方看起来是废弃的房子。2个多小时，太长了，总体平淡、压抑的叙事。偶有一点感情的宣泄高潮。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
